Reverse Mortgages and Senior Retirement Tips: Reverse Mortgage Bill Vetoed In Minnesota

5/22/2009

posted by N. Sioris

Yesterday, Tim Pawlenty, governor of Minnesota vetoed SF 489, which would have had unintended and detrimental consequences for senior homeowners in Minnesota that would like to take advantage of accessing home equity through the use of a reverse mortgage loan.

If passed, the bill would have increased the right to rescind (cancel) period from the current three days, to ten days on the closing of a reverse mortgage loan. It also would have imposed a suitability requirement as well as added restrictions on the cross selling of other financial or insurance products at the time a person takes out a reverse mortgage.

National Oversight Is All Ready In Place - No Need For Over-Kill

HUD in conjunction with AARP and NRMLA (National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association) have collectively taken action to strengthen the protections for seniors on a National basis. In some cases, when states step in and try to implement additional regulations, we see that what actually happens is that the regulations become more confusing and sometimes contradict each other. The so-called "unintended consequences" of meaning well, can backfire and actually cause less availability of a much need product, like a reverse mortgage. We saw that very thing happen in the state of Washington about a year ago. It took until just a couple of weeks ago to get that "unintended consequence" amended, so that now senior citizens in Washington state have full access to competitive reverse mortgage lenders and products.

Had it not been for Governor Tim Pawlenty wisely choosing to veto this bill, something similar could have happened to senior homeowners in the state of Minnesota. Take a look at his comments about his decision below.

Minnesota_Reverse_Mortgage_Veto